Federal Excise (Case Laws)

Federal Excise (Case Laws)

Court Year Petitioner Law/Section Topic Case Law Citation/Ref. View
Islamabad High Court 2023 JS BANK LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED/ATTORNEY AND OTHERS
VS
PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN FEDERAL BOARD REVENUE, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
Federal Excise Act 2005 S. 19(6) & 21 Constitution, Art. 199 Criminal proceedings

Show-cause notice without jurisdiction-Criminal proceedings, initiating of---Pre-conditions--Petitioners were aggrieved of proceedings initiated by authorities on the allegation of obstructing tax recovery process--- Plea raised by Read More...


2023 PTD 704
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS PAKISTAN FRUIT JUICE CO. (PVT.) LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CTO, LAHORE
Federal Excise Act, 2005 7 Value determinition for the purposes of duty/ notional value

Retail price---Scope---Appellant was held liable to include the notional value of Federal Excise Duty in retail price for the purpose of calculating sales tax on the ground that the excise duty was to be factored in while computing the Read More...


2023 PTD 817
Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal 2023 MESSRS PAKISTAN FRUIT JUICE CO. (PVT.) LTD.
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CTO, LAHORE
Federal Excise Act, 2005 7 grant of an extension of time

Recovery of tax- Show cause notice--Adjudication proceedings---Order-in-original--- Limitation--Scope---Commissioner, under subsection (5) of S.11 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and subsection (2) of S. 14 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005, Read More...


2023 PTD 817
Customs Appellate Tribunal 2021 MESSRS BRONX INTERNATIONAL, KARACHI
VS
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF PC A, CUSTOM HOUSE, KARACHI AND 3 OTHERS
Federal Excise Act (VII of 2005), Ss. 3, 29 (2) & 42B Customs Act 1969 S.194-A(4) Ss.18, 26, 26A, 32(2)(3) & 202 Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 148 & 228 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Ss.6 30, 31 & 32-Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4 & 25 Notification SRO No.371 (I)/2002, dated 15-6-2002, Sr.3(ii) coram non judice

No official of Directorate of PCA was empowered to conduct audit in the matter of Federal Excise and Income Tax without powers / justification---Any such audit was void ab-initio and coram non judice---Clearance Collectorates did not have authority to collect Read More...


2021 PTD 51
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2021 MESSRS UNITED INDUSTRIES LTD. LAHORE
VS
THE COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE. LTU, LAHORE
Federal Excise Act 2005 S.7 & 44 Sales Tax Act 1990 S.66 Refund of excise duty to be claimed within one year

Appellant paid Federal Excise Duty on its supplies of locally purchased raw material for production of cooking oil under S.7 of Federal Excise Act, 2005, under sales tax mode---Appellant claimed refund of excise duty but the refund of the appellant was considered as Read More...


2021 PTD 150
Lahore High Court 2021 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE
VS
MESSRS SAMSOL INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. AND OTHERS
Federal Excise Act, 2005 34A findings of facts

Where order of Appellate Tribunal was based on findings of facts, after detailed discussion, deliberation and interpretation of provisions of law and as such did not carry any mistake apparent on record, then same did not require any interference by High Court while Read More...


2021 PTD 155
(2021) 124 TAX 540
Sindh High Court 2021 M/S ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER AND 5 OTHERS
VS
THE ASSISTANT COLLECTOR (P&A) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS
Federal Excise Act, 2005 S.41 & 14 Civil Procedure Code 1908 S.9 Specific Relief Act 1877 S.42 & 12 Show cause without lawful authority

Suit filed in the (Sindh) High Court in its original civil jurisdiction against an Order, Notification relating to a taxing statute-Bar to jurisdiction of "civil courts" under ouster clause in S.41 of Federal Excise Act, 2005-Implied bar Read More...


2021 PTD 281
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2020 MESSRS AL-KHAIR GADOON LTD.
VS
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) S: 4(1)(2), 35 Law: Central Excise Rules, 1944 S: R. 7, 9, 210, 223(6), 294 Procedural laws & Rules

Olas Khan v. Chairman NAB (PLD 2018 SC 40) In this case, while commenting on the erroneous assumption of jurisdiction by the High Court in a matter of bail, it was observed that: "it is now settled position in law that merely citing or Read More...


2020 PTD 18
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2020 MESSRS AL-KHAIR GADOON LTD.
VS
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) S: 4(1)(2), 35 Law: Central Excise Rules, 1944 S: R. 7, 9, 210, 223(6), 294 Show cause notice & incorrect provision of law

Incorrect provision of law mentioned in the notice---Effect- --Quoting of wrong provisions of law in a show cause notice would not necessarily vitiate the entire process initiated thereunder---In deciding the legal validity of the show Read More...


2020 PTD 18
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2020 M/s. Shah Sons Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd.
VS
The Secretary, Revenue Division, Islamabad
Establishment Of Office Of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 9(2)(A), 2(3) & 10 application for revision in sales tax return

Record showed that application of complainant for revision in sales tax return was pending for three months and no action was taken by Dept. despite follow-up reminders---Delay in disposal of complainant's application was evident, which Read More...


2020 PTD 1029
Federal Tax Ombudsman 2019 SAJJAD AHMED
VS
The SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 2(3)(b)(ii), 9(2)(b), 10(1)(4 Refund of tax amount/ delay in

Refund of tax amount, delay in-Taxpayer was aggrieved of delay in process of his tax refund- Indeed--Objections raised under S.9(2)(b) of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 was misconceived as taxpayer had already availed legal remedy Read More...


2019 PTD 1198
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, Zone-II, KARACHI
VS
M/S. SECURITY LEASING CORPORATION LIMITED, KARACHI
Federal Excise Act 2005 S. 14(1). Federal Excise Rules, 2005, Rr.40-A(4) & 45. S.R.O. No. 475(I)/ 2009, dated 13-6-2009 Leasing activities/Levy of federal excise duty

Appellant/taxpayer was engaged in the business of leasing----Tax Officer, held appellant liable to federal excise duty under Third Sched., Table II, Item 8 of Federal Excise Act, 2005 for the period 2007 to 2011 and levied federal excise duty Read More...


2018 PTD 1391
Islamabad High Court 2018 COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL), ISLAMABAD
VS
M/S. WITRIBE, ISLAMABAD
Federal Excise Act, 2005 S. 3, 16, 34A & Sched

Telecommunication services---Internet services---Scope---Question before the High Court was whether an internet service provider was liable to pay federal excise duty which was imposed with regard to voice / telephonic content of internet Read More...


2018 PTD 1413
2020 PTCL 582
Peshawar High Court 2018 CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE
VS
M/S CHERAT CEMENT COMPANY LTD, THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE & 2 OTHERS
Interpretation of statutes Amendment

Any amendment introduced in law has prospective effect, unless the amendment expressly provides for it to have retrospective Read More...


2018 PTD 1617
(2018)118 TAX 339
2018 PTCL 325
Peshawar High Court 2018 CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE
VS
M/S CHERAT CEMENT COMPANY LTD, THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE & 2 OTHERS
Federal Excise Act 2005 S. 46(5) [as inserted by Finance Act 2015] Central Excise Act 1944 S.3-D Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 S. 9(2) & 32 Constitutional of Pakistan, Art. 199 Constitutional petition/Locus standi/Excise duty, refund of

Retrospective effect of amendment in the statue (Federal Excise Act, 2005)---Scope---Dispute was with regard to refund of Excise Duty paid by respondent companies---Federal Tax Ombudsman directed respondent companies to get audit conducted Read More...


2018 PTD 1617
(2018)118 TAX 339
2018 PTCL 325
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue 2001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
VS
FIRST LEASING CO. OF INDIA LTD.
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) First Sched, Item No. 04.03 Pigment/ chemical/ manufacture of pigments

Red lead/ Litharge—Pigment or chemical—Litharge by itself was a pigment but a chemical that was used in the manufacture of pigments/  Red lead in view of its high toxicity was a dying pigment and was seldom used. 

First Sched, Item Read More...


2001 PTD 1799
Supreme Court of Pakistan 2001 COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE AND OTHERS
VS
MESSRS RIAZ BOTTLERS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE AND OTHERS
Central Excise Act (I of 1944) S.4(2) Retail Price

Constitution Read More...


2001 PTD 1854
2004 PTCL 298
Supreme Court of India 2001 PAPER PRODUCTS LTD
VS
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Indian Central Excise Act, 1944 S. 37B Circular are binding on Department

Circular/ Effect—Circular are binding on Department/ Correctness of circulars cannot be challenged by Department even on the ground of their being inconsistent with statutory provision/ Indian Central Excise Act, 1944, S.37B.

Apart from the fact that Read More...


2001 PTD 2253
247 ITR 128